🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor always experienced the weight of her family legacy. As the offspring of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the prominent English artists of the early 20th century, the composer’s reputation was cloaked in the deep shadows of history.

An Inaugural Recording

Not long ago, I contemplated these memories as I prepared to produce the inaugural album of Avril’s concerto for piano composed in 1936. Featuring impassioned harmonies, expressive melodies, and bold rhythms, this piece will offer new listeners valuable perspective into how this artist – an artist in conflict who entered the world in 1903 – envisioned her world as a woman of colour.

Legacy and Reality

But here’s the thing about legacies. It requires time to adapt, to perceive forms as they really are, to separate fact from distortion, and I had been afraid to face Avril’s past for a while.

I had so wanted her to be a reflection of her father. To some extent, that held. The rustic British sounds of parental inspiration can be observed in many of her works, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). Yet it suffices to examine the names of her family’s music to see how he identified as not only a champion of British Romantic style but a representative of the African heritage.

At this point parent and child began to differ.

White America evaluated Samuel by the brilliance of his compositions as opposed to the colour of his skin.

Parental Heritage

During his studies at the renowned institution, the composer – the son of a parent from Sierra Leone and a British mother – began embracing his heritage. At the time the Black American writer the renowned Dunbar came to London in 1897, the young musician eagerly sought him out. He set Dunbar’s African Romances as a composition and the following year incorporated his poetry for a stage piece, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral work that established his reputation: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an worldwide sensation, notably for the Black community who felt indirect honor as the majority evaluated the composer by the quality of his compositions instead of the colour of his skin.

Activism and Politics

Success did not reduce his activism. During that period, he attended the pioneering African conference in the UK where he encountered the Black American thinker this influential figure and observed a variety of discussions, including on the oppression of Black South Africans. He was a campaigner until the end. He sustained relationships with early civil rights leaders such as this intellectual and the educator Washington, spoke publicly on ending discrimination, and even discussed racial problems with President Theodore Roosevelt on a trip to the US capital in 1904. As for his music, the scholar reflected, “he made his mark so high as a composer that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He succumbed in the early 20th century, in his thirties. But what would Samuel have made of his daughter’s decision to be in South Africa in the that decade?

Conflict and Policy

“Child of Celebrated Artist shows support to apartheid system,” ran a headline in the community journal Jet magazine. Apartheid “struck me as the correct approach”, she informed Jet. When asked to explain, she backtracked: she didn’t agree with the system “as a concept” and it “could be left to resolve itself, overseen by benevolent people of all races”. Were the composer more attuned to her father’s politics, or born in the US under segregation, she may have reconsidered about apartheid. But life had protected her.

Identity and Naivety

“I hold a UK passport,” she remarked, “and the government agents did not inquire me about my background.” Thus, with her “fair” skin (as Jet put it), she moved alongside white society, buoyed up by their acclaim for her renowned family member. She presented about her father’s music at the Cape Town university and led the South African Broadcasting Corporation Orchestra in the city, programming the heroic third movement of her concerto, subtitled: “Dedicated to my Father.” Although a accomplished player herself, she never played as the lead performer in her concerto. Instead, she invariably directed as the maestro; and so the segregated ensemble followed her lead.

The composer aspired, as she stated, she “may foster a shift”. Yet in the mid-1950s, things fell apart. After authorities discovered her Black ancestry, she was forced to leave the country. Her UK document offered no defense, the UK representative urged her to go or risk imprisonment. She came home, feeling great shame as the extent of her inexperience became clear. “This experience was a hard one,” she expressed. Adding to her embarrassment was the 1955 publication of her unfortunate magazine feature, a year after her sudden departure from that nation.

A Common Narrative

Upon contemplating with these legacies, I sensed a recurring theme. The account of holding UK citizenship until you’re not – one that calls to mind Black soldiers who served for the English throughout the global conflict and lived only to be denied their due compensation. Along with the Windrush era,